« Weighing the Pros and Cons | Main | Students blogging to learn »

Wikipedia, secondary sources and authority

I'm not sure how prevalent this is here but there is a big debate going on in the United States about using Wikipedia for research. Andy Carvin at learning.now points out that Middlebury College officially disallows citations from Wikipedia. However:


A representative from Wikipedia didn’t exactly dispute the college’s new rules. “That’s a sensible policy,” said Wikipedia’s Sandra Ordonez “Wikipedia is the ideal place to start your research and get a global picture of a topic, however, it is not an authoritative source. In fact, we recommend that students check the facts they find in Wikipedia against other sources. Additionally, it is generally good research practice to cite an original source when writing a paper, or completing an exam. It’s usually not advisable, particularly at the university level, to cite an encyclopedia.”

Andy adds, "Middlebury is right to discourage students from citing Wikipedia as a source while not banning it outright, since it can serve as an excellent launching point for tracking down primary and secondary sources."

Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater seems to be the message. How do you tackle the use of Wikipedia and other online resources?

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on March 5, 2007 1:59 PM.

The previous post in this blog was Weighing the Pros and Cons.

The next post in this blog is Students blogging to learn.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Email Contact


  • Publications Officer, CIT
Powered by
Movable Type 3.35